However, it also offers an opportunity for a shift in how we manage these costly pests, in a way that benefits farmers, our soils and the broader environment.
The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) has proposed to ban chlorpyrifos, an insecticide from the organophosphate group that is used in New Zealand to control a broad range of insect pests on plants. The EPA considers that the risks of using chlorpyrifos now outweigh the benefits. Submissions on the proposed ban were called for and are now being evaluated.
Chlorpyrifos is considered the most effective chemical available to tackle the native grass grub, which is the most pervasive and costly pest for pastoral agriculture in New Zealand. It is also registered for use against another major pasture pest, the Manuka beetle.
The only other insecticide registered for use against grass grub in established pasture is diazinon and its agricultural use will be phased out in New Zealand by 2028.
A study by AgResearch a few years ago estimated that the impact of the grass grub, through reduced pasture production affecting revenue, was up to $380 million annually for dairy farms, and up to $205 million for sheep and beef farms, in “average years”.
Federated Farmers has raised concerns about the potential loss of chlorpyrifos from the farmers’ arsenal, saying it puts farmers in a precarious position without readily available alternatives.
While we must acknowledge that agrichemicals are going to be needed for the foreseeable future, increasingly we are seeing opportunities to research and develop biopesticides that harness naturally occurring organisms such as bacteria to target the pests.
This means opportunities to at least reduce chemical use, if not replace it, in more integrated approaches to pest management. The use of live organisms or derivatives, such as metabolites, are generally more specific to the target pest and have significantly less environmental residues and impacts.